You can visit his blog at RooshV.
January 7, ] volution is the cornerstone of modern biology. It unites all the fields of biology under one theoretical umbrella. It is not a difficult concept, but very few people -- the majority of biologists included -- have a satisfactory grasp of it.
One common mistake is believing that species can be arranged on an evolutionary ladder from bacteria through "lower" animals, to "higher" animals and, finally, up to man.
Mistakes permeate popular science expositions of evolutionary biology. Mistakes even filter into biology journals and texts. For example, Lodish, et. Misunderstandings about evolution are damaging to the study of evolution and biology as a whole. People who have a general interest in science are likely to dismiss evolution as a soft science after absorbing the pop science nonsense that abounds.
The impression of it being a soft science is reinforced when biologists in unrelated fields speculate publicly about evolution.
This is a brief introduction to evolutionary biology. I attempt to explain basics of the theory of evolution and correct many of the misconceptions. Evolution is a change in the gene pool of a population over time.
A gene is a hereditary unit that can be passed on unaltered for many generations. The gene pool is the set of all genes in a species or population. The English moth, Biston betularia, is a frequently cited example of observed evolution. The frequency of the dark morph increased in the years following.
Their frequency was less in rural areas. The moth population changed from mostly light colored moths to mostly dark colored moths.
The increase in relative abundance of the dark type was due to natural selection. Soot from factories darkened the birch trees the moths landed on.
Against a sooty background, birds could see the lighter colored moths better and ate more of them. As a result, more dark moths survived until reproductive age and left offspring.A must-read for anyone who wants to participate in plombier-nemours.coms.
This article lays out the land for evolutionists and creationists alike, presenting the concepts of and the evidence for biological evolution. ‘Someone recently asked me about the 2 nd Law of Thermodynamics, stating that they thought it was irrelevant to creation/evolution because the earth is not an isolated system since the sun is constantly pumping in more energy.
‘This does seem to be a valid point—do creationists still use this. John Clayton has virtually made a career of lecturing most weekends of the year to churches across the country.
His knowledge of science is woefully skewed with ideas of evolution; unfortunately, his acquaintance with the Bible is even more deficient. If you believe that the theory of macroevolution is true, prepare to be challenged.
No, you won't find the usual creationist rhetoric about the second law of thermodynamics, Nebraska Man, or the creationism charges of mistakes made by evolutionists 60 years ago.
What you will find is the best of. Charles Darwin was born in , seven years after his grandfather Erasmus had died. Charles grew up during a conservative period in British and American society, shortly after the Napoleonic Wars.
Thermodynamics vs. Evolutionism [Harold Blum, Time’s Arrow and Evolution (), p. ] “If your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics, I can give you no hope; there is nothing for [your theory] but to collapse in the deepest humiliation.” “The second law of thermodynamics not only is a principle of.